On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:46, Nick Watkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It worked before because that's how it was in 1.0. I noticed the problem
> immediately when I upgraded to 1.1, since our application relies heavily on
> massive tables. The second parameter used to be the index of the last
> requested row.
>
> The second parameter _is_ the index of the last requested row, as was being
demonstrated by Christian's application. His server, however, was taking the
second parameter to be a number of records, not as a last requested row
number. Did 1.0 used to send a number of records as the second parameter? (I
don't recall ever seeing a change in that area...???)
Derrell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
