You're probably right, Derrell. We have another programmer that was working with the remote table model and may have either changed the implementation out from under me or changed the service method and I just didn't notice until 1.1 came out and may have been a coincidence. I'll just keep my mouth shut -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Remote-Table-Problem-tp5277234p5283900.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
