Any opinions on this? On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Jean-Noël Rivasseau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > It seems to me there is a bug in __convertObject() if the underlying > object already has a native toJSON implementation. Because in that > case you do: > > return this.__convert(incoming.toJSON(key), key); (l. 413 in Qx 1.2) > > whereas incoming.toJSON(key) already returns a String. So since it > will go into __convert again the return String will get extra quotes > and will be converted - clearly not what we want. > > I tried today not with a native implementation but with Prototype's > implementation and ran into a bug because of this. > > I think it is sufficient to change the line to: > > return incoming.toJSON(key); > > It works in my case anyway. Should I open a bug or someone will > analyze it and fix it right away? > > PS: I am still waiting for a wiki account to put our application in > the real life examples. If someone can make me an account that would > be great. > > -- > Jean-Noël Rivasseau > Directeur > (1) 778 786 3460 / (33) 01 82 88 05 26 > Kameleoon - morphing the web > http://www.kameleoon.com/ >
-- Jean-Noël Rivasseau Directeur (1) 778 786 3460 / (33) 01 82 88 05 26 Kameleoon - morphing the web http://www.kameleoon.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
