Hi, just weighing in on the qxtransfomer issue:
We decided to keep the xml source file with the generated javascript source file because it makes no sense to duplicate the namespace structure. Both are "source" in the sense that they carry the information from which a final "build" file is created, even if the xml source file is not used directly, but translated into the javascript "intermediary" file first. While it is true that the generated javascript file is kind of "throw-away" because it will be overwritten many times and not to be dealt with directly (it makes no sense, for example, to put it under version control), that must not be this way. One could imagine cases where you use the xml to quickly develop a prototype, and then continue working on the generated javascript source file and throw away the XML. So in my opinion, it doesn't make sense to keep the XML in a separate folder structure. C. -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Sugestion-to-qooxdoo-project-structure-tp5744277p5746953.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
