On 11/17/2010 10:27 AM, panyasan wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> just weighing in on the qxtransfomer issue:
> 
> We decided to keep the xml source file with the generated javascript source
> file because it makes no sense to duplicate the namespace structure. Both
> are "source" in the sense that they carry the information from which a final
> "build" file is created, even if the xml source file is not used directly,
> but translated into the javascript "intermediary" file first. While it is
> true that the generated javascript file is kind of "throw-away" because it
> will be overwritten many times and not to be dealt with directly (it makes
> no sense, for example, to put it under version control), that must not be
> this way. One could imagine cases where you use the xml to quickly develop a
> prototype, and then continue working on the generated javascript source file
> and throw away the XML. So in my opinion, it doesn't make sense to keep the
> XML in a separate folder structure.

But Leandro seems to indicate that qxtransformer *generates* a different
path for the .js files, like {qxtransformer_generated}/admin/... ?! Or
is this due to a custom configuration?

T.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to