On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:12, Gian Marco Gherardi <
[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a really good news!
> Also, given that you enhanced qx.io.remote.Rpc just a few weeks ago,
> am i wrong considering qx.io.remote.Rpc a deprecated implementation?
qx.io.remote.Rpc has not been marked as deprecated, and there are a great
number of us who use it. I doubt it will go away any time soon. As the new
io code matures, there are plans to add an Rpc layer to it. The native
interface will not be entirely backward compatible (there is less
abstraction in the new io code for selection of a transport; the user
selects a transport) but I suspect that we'll end up with something that
allows for providing a nearly compatible interface as a wrapper on the new
Rpc layer.
I continue to develop with qx.io.remote.Rpc, for now, and expect it to
remain available for the foreseeable future. It's kind of like
qx.ui.table.Table and qx.ui.treevirtual.TreeVirtual, which will both
ultimately be replaced with the new qx.ui.virtual.* infrastructure, but
there are so many people using the existing classes that they're likely to
be around for a long, long time.
Derrell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Tips for Better Web Security
Learn 10 ways to better secure your business today. Topics covered include:
Web security, SSL, hacker attacks & Denial of Service (DoS), private keys,
security Microsoft Exchange, secure Instant Messaging, and much more.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426210/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
