I too notice this. Perhaps we should move the non-unit tests to a different package for now so we can easily see what unit tests we have.
-- Martin On 27/09/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 11:53 PM, Steve Vinoski wrote: > Perhaps I'm missing something, but are the Qpid Java unit tests > really unit tests? To me they seem more like system tests. One > critical aspect of a unit test is isolation, typically achieved via > mock objects, but when I look through the code I don't really see > the isolation I expect to see. > > Does anybody have any coverage figures for these tests? Perhaps > someone familiar with the tests could file JIRAs for the parts > known to lack coverage. > > Again, assuming I'm not missing something, this is another reason > why I advocate (and am still working on) moving to maven. It will > force us to get our testing structures in order, will make it > easier to add tests wherever required, and will also give us code > coverage essentially for free. Let me clarify that last sentence: maven will give us code coverage *measurement* essentially for free. --steve
-- Martin Ritchie
