I would also like to see the Python systems test run across both Java
and C++. They
do now for C++, but would like to see this to be the case with Maven.
Carl.
John O'Hara wrote:
+1 for building the Java bits with Maven too (is this a vote?!?)
We need to make sure that the build system for Java is nice for Java
users,
and the packaging for C++ et al is good for them. Ideally they would gel
nicely.
Distribution is, of course, separate from build. So a distribution could
make more compromises than the build system. We need to make the code as
accessable and easy to get going with as possible on all the platforms.
John
On 27/09/06, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 27/09/06, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps we should move the non-unit tests to a different package
for now
so
> we can easily see what unit tests we have.
That is a very good idea.
We have some unit tests but the majority, particularly in the client
test directory are certainly system tests.
RG
