I'm excited by your achievement, but I'm concerned you get the semantics that go with the commands.
Which AMQP Exchanges does ActiveMQ support? Header? Topic? Direct? As a poor analogy; its not great to use French phrases with English words. Has anyone seen the BBC sitcom from years back - "'Allo 'Allo" ? :-) Cheers John On 23/10/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thx for the clarification! On 10/23/06, Kim van der Riet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The version is 0.8. > > However.... > > The original AMQP specification defined the major number as the major > octet/10, while the minor is composed of two numbers, the major octet%10 > and minor octet (are you confused yet?) Hence major octet=8, minor > octet=0 translates to 0.80 under this rule. (This is in reality a > three-level version system made to look like a two-level system.) > > This rule has now been replaced by the more straight forward rule: > major=major octet, minor=minor octet. So the next official release of > the specification later this year will have major=0, minor=9. > > ... A recipe for confusion! ;-) > > Kim > ---- > On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 13:03 -0500, Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > Yes! But BTW.. it seems like at least the version I've been working > > with, > > the version is 8.0. Is this right?? Or is the version actually > > supposed to > > be 0.8??? > > > > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
