Hiram,
Looking at the code, it looks like you run Qpid as a "parallel" broker
inside ActiveMQ with
forwarding through the IO layer. I was looking to see if there where
areas we could work together
but I can't say I see them yet as the current approach there is no
integration in underlying infrastructure.
What are your ideas/plans or use cases moving forward?
Regards,
Carl.
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi John,
We support all the exchanges that are currently supported in the qpid
server. I've got a feeling we may need to add more add more as we
integrate
into the JMS messaging domains.
On 10/24/06, John O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm excited by your achievement, but I'm concerned you get the semantics
that go with the commands.
Which AMQP Exchanges does ActiveMQ support? Header? Topic? Direct?
As a poor analogy; its not great to use French phrases with English
words.
Has anyone seen the BBC sitcom from years back - "'Allo 'Allo" ? :-)
Cheers
John
On 23/10/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thx for the clarification!
>
> On 10/23/06, Kim van der Riet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The version is 0.8.
> >
> > However....
> >
> > The original AMQP specification defined the major number as the
major
> > octet/10, while the minor is composed of two numbers, the major
octet%10
> > and minor octet (are you confused yet?) Hence major octet=8, minor
> > octet=0 translates to 0.80 under this rule. (This is in reality a
> > three-level version system made to look like a two-level system.)
> >
> > This rule has now been replaced by the more straight forward rule:
> > major=major octet, minor=minor octet. So the next official
release of
> > the specification later this year will have major=0, minor=9.
> >
> > ... A recipe for confusion! ;-)
> >
> > Kim
> > ----
> > On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 13:03 -0500, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >
> > > Yes! But BTW.. it seems like at least the version I've been
working
> > > with,
> > > the version is 8.0. Is this right?? Or is the version actually
> > > supposed to
> > > be 0.8???
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>
