On Nov 11, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Steve Vinoski wrote:
I'm not sure how or why we decided to move to a snapshot build of
the Mina stuff, but I think it's potentially going to cause big
problems. In the test/maven work I'm doing this weekend, I let
maven pick up the 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT of the Mina stuff, assuming it was
equivalent to whatever snapshot we've committed to the local lib
directories. That was a bad assumption -- I finally figured out
that when we run against the Mina snapshot jars from the maven
repository, the PoolingFilter is not initialized or destroyed
correctly, and many tests fail miserably.
This is bad, obviously, as it greatly decreases Qpid stability. Can
anyone explain why we moved to what seems to be a very particular
interim snapshot of the Mina stuff? I'll continue to poke around
and see if I can fix Qpid to work with the maven snapshot, but in
general, do we really want to expose ourselves to what seems like
unstable code? Should we instead go back to 0.9.5?
Looks like Mina 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT is no longer available, but I tried
1.0.0 with my maven stuff and it seems to work.
--steve
