On 26/01/07, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is an interesting idea. We could do that for both the broker and the > client, assuming that there's a commons-configuration class which supports > the > user's desired format.
Maybe jarjar could be used to repackage commons-configuration so that we can use it but not extend the client's dependency set. commons-configuration does seem pretty good. See http://tonicsystems.com/products/jarjar/ Has anyone used it? RG
