On 5/24/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cliff, Paul,
yes, all the dev lists and wiki are public
amqp.108.redhat.com has links to them. You can also get to them form the
www.amqp.org. All the JIRA
text is also being posted to the dev list so all development activity
can be read by anyone. The
pages on the dtx stuff are here:
https://wiki.108.redhat.com/wiki/index.php/AMQP:Transaction_SIG
Carl,
This is exactly the page where I noticed that the three dtx pdf files
all require a username and password. Maybe you don't get this prompt
due to a cached credentials; but that's what I get.
This is why I ask the question. Are there other specifications being
used that are password-controlled? Was this unintentional? If so,
when can this get fixed (i.e. remove password control from all
relevant docs on the AMQP site or simply copy all relevant docs to the
Qpid wiki)?
Cliff
Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Cliff
>
> Aha. Thanks for spotting this. I raised the same issue over on
> Tuscany-Dev a while back.
> I think the first thing we need to see is what NDAs or License
> agreements do you need to sign to join the AMQP working group.
>
> Paul
>
> PS I don't want to hear you have to sign an NDA to see the NDA :-)
>
> On 5/24/07, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 4/30/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Aranud,
>> >
>> > Non working group memeber are not allowed to access the AMQP wiki.
>> > So it's better to put the design in the Qpid wiki.
>>
>> Did this ever get fixed? I don't see much on dtx on the Qpid wiki and
>> several of the AMQP specification pages appear to be locked.
>>
>> I haven't gotten this impression before, but now I have to ask -- has
>> there been Qpid implementation work going on that is based on
>> specifications that are not available to the public?
>>
>> Cliff
>>
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Rajith.
>> >
>> > On 4/24/07, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Arnaud,
>> > >
>> > > Sorry if I'm missing something - but it's the info on the
>> implementation
>> > > for
>> > > Qpid I'm looking for, as opposed to protocol definitions ?
>> > >
>> > > Is that level of detail available for a Qpid JIRA or is that yet
>> to come ?
>> > >
>> > > Bfn,
>> > > Marnie
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 4/24/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi Marnie,
>> > > >
>> > > > You'll find all the material on the AMPQ wiki:
>> > > > https://wiki.108.redhat.com/wiki/index.php/AMQP:Transaction_SIG
>> > > >
>> > > > Do no hesitate to email me if you have questions.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > >
>> > > > Arnaud
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 12:35 +0100, Marnie McCormack wrote:
>> > > > > Hi Arnaud,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > What JIRA(s) are you working on ? I'd like to have a look at the
>> > > > > plan/design for the dtx work on Qpid - is it doc'd somewhere
>> please ?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks & Regards,
>> > > > > Marnie
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 4/23/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > After having talked with Rob, we came to the
>> conclusion that I
>> > > > > can
>> > > > > integrate my dtx work with the current version of the
>> trunk.
>> > > > > This is what I am currently doing and I'll provide
>> patches
>> > > > > through a
>> > > > > regular committer.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Arnaud
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
