On 26/07/07, Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the goal is not necessarily to make the complex cases look > simple, but rather to make the simple cases look normal, i.e. there is > no reason we can't choose an URL syntax that looks normal when you're > only specifying a single broker rather than a list of brokers.
Yes, but I personally (and I accept this is entirely just opinion) prefer orthogonality that covers all cases than "simplicity" that results in more complex cases looking "different". > > Maybe we should create something more like a corbaloc address? > > I believe the 0-10 URL scheme is actually modeled on corbaloc. Having just looked at it briefly I can see that. It works much better IMO than a "regular" URL and neatly handles multiple hosts etc. I don't know why we didn't base it on corbaloc originally. I don't see client_id in it but I presume that is because the concept has been removed in 0-10. RG
