All,

Thanks for the info, particularly on the interop testing. Sounds great !

Really pleased to see things trucking along so well - thanks all.

Regards,
Marnie


On 7/20/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The release notes generated by that link is not helpful at all as you
> cannot
> generate release notes filtered by
> Components. Hence it contains JIRA items for all builds.
>
> I used filters and generated my own reports.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
> On 7/19/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 19/07/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Martin,
> > >
> > > Let me cut the RC for java tomorrow.
> > > I will ask Alan/Andrew to update the cpp files for us
> > > Are we supposed to list the JIRA's in the release notes in addition to
> > any
> > > text ? If so I believe Marnie has a list of them somewhere where we
> can
> > > link.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajith
> >
> > Rajith,
> >
> > The JIRA system generates the Release Notes for us.
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310520&styleName=Html&version=12312116
> > We just need a plain text version and taking a look at the M1 release
> > notes we should put in a list of Know Issues and links back to our
> > wiki.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > > On 7/18/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 18/07/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Rajith,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think everything is in line now for us to start cutting RC from
> > the
> > > > > distribution directory on the java M2.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me know if you find any problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Well when I say that we are ready I mean we are apart from :
> > > > 521(ReleaseNotes) and 522(Readme & online javadoc) are still to be
> > > > done.
> > > >
> > > > > On 18/07/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > On 17/07/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 17/07/07, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Martin Ritchie wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 17/07/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> One of the action items pending is to change the
> licensing
> > > > header in
> > > > > > > > >> source
> > > > > > > > >> files to ASL 2.0 version.
> > > > > > > > >> This has to be done across all languages.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This has already been done on the Java code base.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think the issue is that there are some files with an 'old'
> > > > version of
> > > > > > > > the 2.0 license. E.g. from java:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> broker/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/server/queue/QueueNotificationListener.java
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (cf
> > > > broker/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/server/queue/AMQQueue.java)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > c++ has plenty of the old version as well...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I see that now.. I thought they had been updated.. and I would
> > have
> > > > > > > thought the RAT would have spotted that too. Will check the
> > > > settings.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Martin Ritchie
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rather than spending more time on the RAT thing I just compared
> > the
> > > > > > head of the java files with the license file, using:
> > > > > > for j in `find . -name "*.cpp"` ; do head -22 $j | grep "*" |
> diff
> > -w
> > > > > > ../java/etc/license_header.txt - > /dev/null ; if [[ $? == 1 ]]
> ;
> > then
> > > > > > head -22 $j |grep "*" |grep contributor > /dev/null; if [[ $? ==
> 1
> > ]]
> > > > > > ; then echo $j ; fi ; fi  ; done
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe that got all the offending files, for interested I ran
> > it
> > > > > > against the rest of the code base. There were a few cpp/c# files
> > that
> > > > > > needed updated but only one ruby.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The spec files have their AMPQ copyright notice however the
> > cluster
> > > > > > xml files have ASL on them is that correct?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thought you cpp/c# fokes might find the list helpful when
> checking
> > the
> > > > > > code for M2 release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > CPP
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ./lib/broker/Daemon.cpp
> > > > > > ./lib/common/CommonOptions.cpp
> > > > > > ./lib/common/ExceptionHolder.cpp
> > > > > > ./lib/common/sys/posix/EventChannel.cpp
> > > > > > ./lib/common/sys/posix/EventChannelConnection.cpp
> > > > > > ./lib/common/sys/posix/EventChannelThreads.cpp
> > > > > > ./lib/common/sys/Runnable.cpp
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ./lib/broker/Daemon.h
> > > > > > ./lib/common/doxygen_mainpage.h
> > > > > > ./lib/common/ExceptionHolder.h
> > > > > > ./lib/common/sys/AtomicCount.h
> > > > > > ./lib/common/sys/Mutex.h
> > > > > > ./lib/common/sys/posix/EventChannel.h
> > > > > > ./lib/common/sys/posix/EventChannelConnection.h
> > > > > > ./lib/common/sys/posix/EventChannelThreads.h
> > > > > > ./tests/MockSessionHandler.h
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > C#
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Buffer.Tests/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Client/Client/Message/QpidHeaders.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Client.Tests/interop/InteropClientTestCase.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Client.Tests/interop/TestCases/TestCase1DummyRun.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Client.Tests/interop/TestCases/TestCase2BasicP2P.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Client.Tests/interop/TestCases/TestCase3BasicPubSub.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Client.Tests/interop/TestClient.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Client.Tests/interop/TopicPublisher.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Common.Tests/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Sasl/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
> > > > > > ./Qpid.Sasl.Tests/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
> > > > > > ./TopicListener/Program.cs
> > > > > > ./TopicListener/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
> > > > > > ./TopicPublisher/Program.cs
> > > > > > ./TopicPublisher/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Martin Ritchie
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Martin Ritchie
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Ritchie
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Ritchie
> >
>

Reply via email to