On 06/08/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is done. I have also changed the 0.10 client package name to be > consistent with the one used in common. So, I have moved > org.apache.qpid.nclient to org.apache.qpidity. > What do you think about this name? Should we keep it or change it? I > think that whatever name we go for, we should use it consistently > between common and client (and eventually broker).
You mean the name "qpidity"? How did you arrive at it? RG
