Robert Greig wrote:
On 06/08/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is done. I have also changed the 0.10 client package name to be
consistent with the one used in common. So, I have moved
org.apache.qpid.nclient to org.apache.qpidity.
What do you think about this name? Should we keep it or change it? I
think that whatever name we go for, we should use it consistently
between common and client (and eventually broker).
You mean the name "qpidity"? How did you arrive at it?
I wanted a temporary package name to submit my code, so I just tacked
the first thing onto qpid that sounded vaguely like a word. As it turns
out "cupidity" is actually a real, but obscure, word that has a mildly
amusing meaning.
--Rafael
