On 22/08/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I strongly oppose it to be the official way to use AMQP.
I agree with you here. I would like to see a Qpid API, that is 1:1 the protocol, and wrt language conventions, the same across all our target languages, that does not look like JMS. However for JMS users, they can cast down to the native Qpid Interface and > use AMQP features. > (This is something I initially disagreed, but I understand that this may > provide a more gradual migration path) > Again, I agree. This is hows its done in M2. This is just for Java, to be JMS compatible, and as you say to slightly evolve JMS for the benefit of its existing audience. I'd prefer to say cast-across, but lets not be picky! Shame about the other thread, I was hoping we might set a new record. Rupert
