No the record was some 80 odd emails, when discussed the API thing last time :)
Rajith On 8/22/07, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 22/08/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I strongly oppose it to be the official way to use AMQP. > > > I agree with you here. I would like to see a Qpid API, that is 1:1 the > protocol, and wrt language conventions, the same across all our target > languages, that does not look like JMS. > > However for JMS users, they can cast down to the native Qpid Interface and > > use AMQP features. > > (This is something I initially disagreed, but I understand that this may > > provide a more gradual migration path) > > > > Again, I agree. This is hows its done in M2. This is just for Java, to be > JMS compatible, and as you say to slightly evolve JMS for the benefit of > its > existing audience. I'd prefer to say cast-across, but lets not be picky! > > Shame about the other thread, I was hoping we might set a new record. > > Rupert >
