On 22/08/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robert Godfrey wrote:
> > My view...
> >
> > In any sane development environment people who code in Java are going to
> > want to code against JMS.
>
> My view is...
>
> Same as Robs for App development guys, they will most likely use JMS.
>
> For people that are building services of infrastructure on top of us
> will NOT use JMS.
>
> So my view - we need both.



Yes - my view is that if you are building infrastructure that is the same
level as building the JMS API - i.e. building on top of the low level AMQP
API.  I strongly believe that this AMQP API needs to be public and well
documented.  The point of using a different API for infrastructure is (one
would presume) from getting the efficiencies of being closer to the wire
protocol?

-- Rob

> Carl.
>
>

Reply via email to