Robert Godfrey wrote:
On 22/08/07, *Carl Trieloff* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:Robert Godfrey wrote: > My view... > > In any sane development environment people who code in Java are going to > want to code against JMS. My view is... Same as Robs for App development guys, they will most likely use JMS. For people that are building services of infrastructure on top of us will NOT use JMS. So my view - we need both.Yes - my view is that if you are building infrastructure that is the same level as building the JMS API - i.e. building on top of the low level AMQP API. I strongly believe that this AMQP API needs to be public and well documented. The point of using a different API for infrastructure is (one would presume) from getting the efficiencies of being closer to the wire protocol?
yes, if I was building a proxy server for RBAC for example I would not want to use JMS, I would want to be closer to the wire.
Carl.
