On 29/08/2007, Michael Arnoldus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a potential AMQP user I cannot stress how much it means to know > that there exist interop between different implementations. I've read > a lot about different messaging products, and from my point of view, > the quickest way to kill AMQP, would be that there existed several > implementations, all with their own private extensions that makes any > kind of interop impossible. That completely removes the trust in AMQP > as a standard.
Yes, this is something I think we are all becoming more focussed on now. As with any new specification we found some weaknesses in earlier versions (which have been addressed in the later versions), but to satisfy immediate user demands we added those features into our own implementation. There should be little need for this kind of thing going forward. Now that we have at least one other decent implementation we can do serious interop testing. > So I have been so glad to see all the discussions lately about > interop between all 3 known implementations. If I can influence > anyone at all, please be very conscious about following the AMQP > standard, so us users really do believe it is a standard and that we > can trust it. Which is the third implementation you are thinking about? RG
