On 29/08/2007, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given that M2 has taken so long I can understand the desire to release > it, but now that you state the obvious.. that we are not using 0-9 I > have to wonder if we should re-scope M2. > > This would IMO work out nicely: > > M1 = AMQP 0_8 > M2 = AMQP 0_9 > M3 = AMQP 0_10
Does M2 actually implement 0_9? Are we sure about that? > The more we talk about this the less convinced I am that we should > release M2 in the current state. Does Rabbit have a version that implements 0_9? If Rabbit does not then by changing our version number we are only "fixing" the interop in the sense that we are not advertising a version incorrectly but since there aren't any other implementations it doesn't really help users. RG
