On 07/09/2007, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 07/09/2007, Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The intermittent failures described in QPID-580 could quite possibly > > indicate message loss, although it is impossible to know for sure due to > > the way the test is constructed. > > > > Also, QPID-573 causes message duplication which, depending on your > > application, may be as bad as message loss. > > OK. My own feeling is that we should release M2 now and plan to > release an M2.1 (as already discussed) and potentially an M2.0.1 (for > any users who want just the bug fixes without the protocol upgrade > "risk"). > > M2 (or mostly M2) is being used in production today and has undergone > a fair amount of testing so I think it is reasonable to go ahead with > it. I would rather draw a line in the sand with it, and then get into > a habit of doing much more frequent bug fix and minor improvement > releases.
I would tend to agree. Looking at the JIRAs I don't see any message loss issues. The worse case is message ordering under load my not be maintained. > RG > -- Martin Ritchie
