On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 11:02 +0100, Rupert Smith wrote: > And, yes, if a test is in 'client' but is suitable to be run against > any broker, then it could correctly be part of integration tests. The > reason these tests are not in that module, is because that module was > intended for interop, against a remote broker. Therefore, the tests in > that module are not run automatically as part of the build, because > the extra step of automating the start/stop of remote brokers has not > been done.
ok, I agree with that and I am adding the step of starting/stopping a remote broker. I am doing it in the client module for now. I would suggest that we then review those tests and decide together the ones we want to move into integration Tests. Just to be sure that I correctly understand, the tests in the systests module should not be pure JMS. If this is the case then I fully agree with you regarding the distinction between integration tests and sys tests. Moreover, they may be tests in the client module that we want to move in systests. Am I right?
