On 08/11/2007, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think there has been a degradation, its just that the test is > different. As I said, the client machine maxed out before the broker or > network did, so the 100k I observed was not the brokers best effort. In fact > I will try and run the test that gave you 200k+ and see if I can improve my > test case to do this too.
That is interesting since previously we were not hitting the CPU limit even with 16 clients running. > One thing I did notice about the 200k test, is that it only ran for > 0.5seconds. ? The test was configurable in terms of the number of messages sent. We ran with various sizes (including very large numbers) but it was pretty consistent so I think we often just ran with 10,000 message batches. > If latency is around 50ms (guessing), then it would be > advisable to > run the test for at least 5 seconds (100 times latency). I hope latency is far lower than 50ms for transient messaging. > The test you are refering to is Publisher/Listener under > org.apache.qpid.topic? Yes. RG
