On 08/11/2007, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought I saw 'total time: 500ms' on a previous mail you sent about this, > but I guess I am mistaken.
We did end up running for short periods but we also ran for much longer periods. As I said the results per second were consistent. > Trouble with max throughput tests, is that at saturation who can say what > the latency will be? Yes, the steady state point is interesting too. RG
