Yes, its 343 per second, per consumer. Which seems reasonable given the approximate disk IOPS. Just seems like SwiftMQ have managed to get their write combining to work more effectively than ours.
On 08/11/2007, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 08/11/2007, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Auto ack it did 8k msgs/sec. > > Using transactions, and one msg/transaction it did 5.5k. > > > > This was p2p, 1:1 run 16 times in parallel, to give the best possible > > opportunity for parallelism and tricks like write combining. I was > > impressed. > > So this is 5.5k msgs/second per consumer or is it 5500/16= 343 per > second per consumer? > > RG >
