On 10/01/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /That is only not very impressive given they used a 16 core box to do it > and 4k messages. I did some comp runs when the numbers first came out > and Rabbit is a hog compared to qpid, and a lot slower for the same CPU.
Yes I ran our topic test against it and it used lots of CPU compared with Qpid and ground to a halt with about 4 consumers. Enabling all prospective users to run tests easily against any broker would help users make choices between different implementations. This was why I was so keen to have interop. RG
