On 10/01/2008, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While trying to claim the title of the "fastest AMQP broker in the > West" may be appealing to our egos; we mustn't lose sight of the fact > that providing a reliable, well documented, and well supported > solution at fairly low message volumes is probably higher on most > peoples wish list. Certainly none of the deployments of Qpid that I > have been involved in have stretched in any way its performance.
I think it is true that people don't generally need what someone we know calls "extreme performance" but I think message brokers are a bit like washing machines. People *say* they want outstanding performance and scalability even if in reality when they get it home they just use the same two programmes all the time. RG
