Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are no distributions of the other languages as we had in M2 for
example. Is that intentional?
Yeah, they were only ever source distributions and it seemed a bit
silly (and error prone as it was an entirely manual process) to
distribute seperate source packages for each one.
For c++ at least there is a big difference, the source distribution
created by the build just requires configure to be run. Otherwise the
full and up to date set of autoconf/automake tools are needed.
For python and ruby having a small and focused download also seems
better (though I agree its not significantly different from whats in the
svn).
