On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aidan Skinner wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There are no distributions of the other languages as we had in M2 for > > > example. Is that intentional? > > > > > > Yeah, they were only ever source distributions and it seemed a bit > > silly (and error prone as it was an entirely manual process) to > > distribute seperate source packages for each one. > > That makes no sense, it hurts adoption. Should be not create binaries? We've (AFAIK) only ever shipped binaries for Java and .Net (as they are platform independent), everything else has been a source release. The change from previous versions is that I've not created source archives with just the cpp/python/ruby in them, just one big source archive with everything. If people strongly object I can upload them later, but I think this is a saner way to go. - Aidan -- aim/y!:aidans42 g:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://aidan.skinner.me.uk/ "We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to each other."
