On 28/04/2008, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that these should better be in some directories under qpid, instead > of qpid/java. As they are not 100% Java isn't it? > > Regards, > Senaka
+1 , Looking back a trunk again (having not paid much attention for the last year) there does seem to be a large number of files that IMHO should have a different home: 010ExcludeList 010ExcludeList-store 08ExcludeList clean-dir cpp.async.testprofile cpp.sync.testprofile cpp.testprofile default.testprofile log4j-test.xml test-provider.properties If it is test related it should be in a test directory. If it is a profile to test the C++ broker then it should be with the C++ broker. Also is the list in 010ExcludeList-store a list of tests to exclude when running against the C++ Persistent store module that is not part of Qpid? as for clean-dir: #!/bin/bash rm -rf $@; mkdir $@ Do we really need that checked in to svn? Can I ask that the creators of the file add a comment to the top so we know why it is there? It would be good to tidy up some of the old files. java/broker/etc/* is another example of files that needs a look at. Regards Martin > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Senaka Fernando wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Is it required to have C++ test profiles in the Java directory? > > > > > > > Where else would they go? It would be odd to put configuration for the > > Java client in the C++ directory. > > > > --Rafael > > > > > -- Martin Ritchie
