Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking

[TLFox]

Robert Greig wrote:
> 
> 
> I was trying to come up with something you could do if you are
> determined not to use transactions. I wouldn't do it - I would use
> transactions for this use case.
> 
> RG
> 
> 

Ok fair enough. But the point is the JMS spec requires this to be possible
by *just using the JMS API*

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Persistent-messages-sent-non-blocking-tp17517786p17519371.html
Sent from the Qpid Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.