Robert Greig wrote: > > I would support the addition of a flag to make non-txnal sends > synchronous but we have not had any user demand for this yet - many > people have asked about this but have been happy to use txns. > > RG > > You may not know until the shit hits the fan. Joe user ports application from ANother messaging system to QPID. After a crash they realise they have lost data. They scream "how can this be, we are using persistent messages?". You explain to them that QPID does not send persistent messages synchronously. They move to ANOtherSystem2. ;) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Persistent-messages-sent-non-blocking-tp17517786p17519470.html Sent from the Qpid Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking Robert Greig
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking TLFox
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blockin... Robert Greig
- Re: Persistent messages sent non bl... TLFox
- Re: Persistent messages sent no... Robert Greig
- Re: Persistent messages sent no... TLFox
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking Robert Godfrey
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking Robert Greig
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking TLFox
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blockin... Robert Greig
- Re: Persistent messages sent non bl... TLFox
- Re: Persistent messages sent non bl... TLFox
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blockin... Robert Godfrey
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking Rajith Attapattu
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blockin... Robert Greig
- Re: Persistent messages sent non bl... Rajith Attapattu
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking Robert Greig
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking TLFox
- Re: Persistent messages sent non blocking Robert Godfrey
