I've actually wondered about this, the FAQ or README does not state this
point. I wonder why forking from inetd vs. qpopper forking itself would
offer a major performance gain? Server mode on the other hand may offer
more performance gain depending on the users activities...
Rgds,
-GSH
Edward Siewick wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Admin Mailing Lists wrote:
> > Can someone list the advantages and disadvantages of running qpopper in
> > standalone mode vs. xinetd mode
>
> 1. Performance
> 2. Performance
> 3. Performance
>
> Generally, if you've got heavy demand for POP3, configure for standalone
> as this avoids the start-up costs for the process. If you've got
> infrequent demand, just run from [x]inetd.
>
> Edward
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] DigiPro Digital Productions, LLC
> Voice: 703-522-8465 3100 North Quincy Street
> Fax: 703-522-8417 Arlington, Virginia 22207
