At 3:36 PM +1300 1/11/01, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Randall Gellens wrote:
>
>> We're not selling a beta per se. We're selling software that
>> currently happens to be in beta.
>
> And whose development has been mostly driven by the net community over
> the last 15 years.
>
> I hope you've removed the opensource parts of the code.
Compare the Qpopper releases over the past few years. Very
significant amounts of code have been rewritten, cleaned up,
improved. Many day-one bugs have been fixed (some quite serious).
This was done by QUALCOMM in the free open-source Qpopper. QUALCOMM
remains fully committed to an open source Qpopper. Qpopper LX is
simply an additional choice for people. If enough people chose to
purchase LX, it gives us revenue to support both the free Qpopper and
Qpopper LX. How is any of this a bad thing?
