Re: Changes in how keep-temp-drop works

[Randall Gellens]

At 2:37 PM -1000 6/11/01, Clifton Royston wrote:

>    If it always has to be locked, then that's probably the safest place
>  to do it.  I may try that out here and see if it fixes things while
>  waiting for an update.

The other place to do it, which would be somewhat more efficient, is 
in pop_updt.c when we decide that the session is in server mode, and 
all messages are deleted, or spool isn't dirty.