> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 09:31:10AM +0800, PM WONG wrote:
> > Since most Unix servers come with a pop server of their own
> > OS, i wonder when do we consider switching to use qpopper
> > instead.
> 
> SuSE imho comes e.g. with Qpopper.
> so if you use an very old version of this os, you can/or have
> to install a new version for example.
> another scenario would be, that you have to switch to another
> os and would like to use qpopper, because you know the syntax
> of the conf-file, etc.
But some of the people who has used qpopper commented about its
sophistication, such as slowness for too much I/O (creation of
temp files ..etc) and other things.
So why don't we use a simple one like those which comes with the OS

Reply via email to