At 04:08 PM 9/11/2002, Scott Johnson wrote:
>I'm trying to stay away from beta-level software at my 
>installation.  Here's what I'm running:
>
>OS:  FreeBSD 4.5
>OpenSSL: 0.9.6g
>qpopper: 4.0.4
>Eudora: 5.1.1
>
>I haven't tried connecting to qpopper via SSL with other clients because I 
>quite frankly haven't found any other POP3 clients that I can stand to use.

connecting to qpopper via SSL works fine with Netscape (newer versions), 
Outlook Express, Outlook, etc. I've had very little trouble with it. I do 
use Eudora myself.


>The tls-options setting that Brian mentioned below definitely doesn't work 
>with 4.0.4:
>
>Unrecognized option; scanning "tls-options" at line 9 of config file 
>/etc/popper.conf

tls-options is a new item in 4.0.5. So if you don't want to use the beta, 
you don't want to use that command.

>So does qpopper just not work with the more recent versions of OpenSSL?

It seems to depend on your build of OpenSSL, near as I can tell. I'm not an 
OpenSSL guru (and you may not find such on this list). You may want to 
check with the OpenSSL folks to see what they have to say. If you were 
working fine before using 0.9.6g of OpenSSL, then things broke, it would 
seem to point to a problem in OpenSSL.


>-Scott
>
>
>At 02:42 PM 9/11/2002, you wrote:
>>         Which clients are causing this problem for everyone?
>>
>>         I only had it with Eudora 5.1.1 (the latest available) only
>>when I upgraded to OpenSSL 0.97-beta3 - Outlook, Outlook Express,
>>Netscape, and Opera didn't generate that message.
>>
>>         Getting 4.0.5b1 and setting SSL_OP_DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS
>>fixed it.
>>
>>OS:             SunOS 5.8/sparc
>>OpenSSL:        0.97-beta3
>>qpopper:        4.0.5b1
>>
>># SSL_OP_DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS
>>set tls-options=0x00000800
>>
>>         Setting this setting doesn't seem desirable in the long run
>>(why else would it not be default behavior?) - hopefully a newer
>>release of Eudora will address this.
>>
>>         I am guessing that OpenSSL 0.96g may be causing the same problem
>>for everyone that is using it.
>>
>>         I did not need to set the more sweeping tls-workarounds setting.
>>
>>Brian
>>======================================================================
>>On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:08:50PM -0500, Scott Johnson wrote:
>> > At 04:42 AM 9/11/2002, you wrote:
>> > >At 10:08 PM 9/10/02 -0700, Chuck Yerkes wrote:
>> > >>Start with "ldd qpopper"
>> > >>
>> > >>see which libraries it's using, which .h files the build
>> > >>is hitting.
>> > >>
>> > >>You might get adventurous on your build machine and gzip
>> > >>the appropriate .h files in /usr/include/ and maybe the libssl.*
>> > >>stuff.  Just to be sure your build isn't using it.
>> > >>
>> > >>Force it to link static (CFLAGS+=-static) so you don't
>> > >>catch the wrong static libssl.so
>> > >
>> > >Chuck!  Chuck!
>> > >
>> > >I think you may have found it!  Under FreeBSD it seems to be 
>> utilizing the
>> > >wrong libraries!
>> > >
>> > >I recompiled and tweaked the library loc settings and I think I got it
>> > >working! Give me a few days to play with it to make sure I'm right, but
>> > >you pointed me in the right direction!  I think we may have figured out
>> > >what the FreeBSD problem is.
>> > >
>> > >Thanks very much!!
>> >
>> >
>> > I finally got qpopper to build on FreeBSD last night after cleaning out
>> > more libraries.  It seems that a stale libcrypto was the cause this
>> > time.  I still get an error when trying to connect to qpopper via SSL/TLS,
>> > however:
>> >
>> > Possible probe of account xxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > I think I'm just going to need to go through and remove more old headers
>> > and libraries, but I'm going to make this work one way or another.
>> >
>> > -Scott
>>
>>--
>>    _____________________________________________________________________
>>   / Brian C. Hill       [EMAIL PROTECTED]          http://brian.bch.net    \
>>   | Unix Specialist     BCH Technical Services  http://www.bch.net      |

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Senie                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amaranth Networks Inc.                    http://www.amaranth.com

Reply via email to