There is a patch for MySql and PAM authorisation and the general public is providing some patches. I added a patch for Digest CGI. I even add CGIWRAP to get over suid issues.
I can't see it to hard to add Radius or LDAP, but anyway this is a popper list not the neomail list. Wayne At 04:26 PM 18/09/02 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I like it too BUT it is no longer being developed. Due to an IP >restriction with Ernie's (the author) employer, he felt it was neccessary >to cease development until the situation changes. It also reads from your >passwd/shadow files. Last I checked it can't use NIS, RADIUS, TACACS, >LDAP, or PAM. You can however easily hack it up and add things like >mouseovers (what I added), default signatures, etc... OpenWebmail is a >fork of Neomail and is pretty nice too. I don't know about auth options >though. > >Like I said, I like Neomail. That's what we're using now. However we're >switching to something else for auth needs primarily. I don't really have >a grasp on how CPU intensive it is. We have users with large mail spools >that hurt us when the POP their spools. I don't notice when they use >webmail though. > >HTH > Justin > > > >On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Wayne Heming wrote: > > > I just installed neomail http://neomail.sourceforge.net/ > > > > Its works fine with limited extra tools, perl, DB, CGI. and FREE. and > > doesn't require IMAP. > > > > very simple to install. > > > > Not sure of max users etc, didn't really go into that. > > > > Wayne > > > > At 03:17 PM 17/09/02 -0400, Alan Brown wrote: > > >On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Frank Pineau wrote: > > > > > > > IMP (http://www.horde.org) supports POP3 and IMAP. Frankly, if you're > > > doing > > > > webmail, IMAP is nicer anyway. > > > > > >Having run both, I strongly agree. :-) > > > >
