Sorry havn't searched this in the docs yet Is it a compiletime option?
What will happen when I change this on an existing server? Will it give me the "new mail" problem? What will that do to system overhead? I run 75 000 mailboxes on a single server here so I am worried about that and cannot take chances. Mozzi On Wednesday 02 July 2003 20:42, Daniel Senie wrote: > At 01:57 PM 7/2/2003, The Little Prince wrote: > >On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Alan W. Rateliff, II wrote: > > > Possibly related to an earlier thread, ANY time I recompile QPopper, > > > even with the same options, all stored mail gets redownloaded. I > > > personally store messages on the server for up to 5 days so I have > > > access to it via my webmail, and several of my users (mostly family) > > > leave messages on the machine as well because they use the webmail > > > exclusively (although that end is processed by UW-IMAP.) > > > >That's, well, interesting. It shouldn't happen. Have you tried doing a > >UIDL list of msgs, recompile qpopper, do another UIDL list of msgs and > >compare the UIDLs. (telnet to 110, USER username, PASS password, then > >just UIDL to list UIDLs) (I don't know how knowledgable you are in POP3 > >commands). The lists should match. > > To allow proper interaction with the webmail solution we use, we have > qpopper compute UIDL on the fly, rather than store in the mailbox. We find > this works MUCH better. Might be worth trying. > > Dan ************************************************************ Scanned by @lantic IS Virus Control Service This message was scanned for viruses and dangerous content. @lantic Internet Services (Pty) Ltd. - http://www.lantic.net eScan for Windows-based PCs - http://www.escan.co.za ************************************************************
