is there some reason you just didn't start with a pop3 server and pop3 webmail, if this is what you wanted? just curious
--Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.asteroid-b612.org "It's not easy bein' green..there's so many colors I'd rather be" .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Florian Effenberger wrote: > Hi there, > > > i know this isn't an answer, but WHY would you want to do that? > > it's kind of like asking, does anyone know how to get the mysql server > > to serve ms-sql databases instead? > > I want to use webmail and a local mail client parallel. As soon as the > webmail filters into folders, POP3 cannot fetch the messages anymore. > However, IMAP is "bad" for me because I woul like to have all messages > fetched from the server and then have them deleted immediately from > there, which seems to be impossible with current IMAP clients without a > lot of hassle... :-( > > Florian >
