On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 05:13:43PM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > It probably has to be re-written with locking (though I haven't read > > the code for the plugin - does it lock?) > > Yes, it does lock. I didn't check that it will always remove the lock.
I *think* the lockings right, but I'm happy to be corrected. > I note that it returns DECLINED on various failure conditions. Shouldn't > that be DENYSOFT (so admin has a chance to fix the problem)? DECLINED should be more conservative than DENYSOFT, in the sense that an error on the configuration side should not cause email to get bounced. Admittedly, that won't happen until the remote MTA queue time expires, but I'd still rather let spam through than bounce real mail because of configuration snafus. Cheers, Gavin
