How does speedycgi compare to pperl? Is pperl being used more as a generic term for persistent perl processes? Speedycgi has worked wonderfully for me (Debian Sarge 2.22-1) without any apparent problems. However, most of the discussions I've seen tend to mention pperl rather than speedycgi.
If they are not interchangeable, what advantages are there of one over the other? They seem to both have the same concept (backend pre- compiled process). Any other users of speedycgi wish to speak up? My server has a relatively low flow of traffic, so it's not the best example.
Elliot F.
I had the opposite experience of Matt. I had problems with PPerl, so I switched to SpeedyCGI, and it works great for me. My incoming mail server (Dual 2.8Ghz Xeon, 2G RAM) gets ~20,000 emails per hour consistently every day, and handles the load very well.
Andy Ruse
