On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 11:35:50AM -0800, Robert Spier wrote: > > I'd suggest if a name is followed by an exclamation mark, this means do a > > DENYHARD, otherwise it does a plain DENY (ie "tim" - will reject this > > recipient, "tim !" will reject all emails that include "tim" amongst the > > recipients). > > I think it would be cleaner to do this as a wrapped plugin and two > separate config files.[1]
I think it was better the first time. The two behaviors are isomorphic except in returning one different value for one different input. If it required a backwards-incomptible change in the config syntax it'd be another matter, but this seems a natural extension to what the plugin did before which contradicts no other extensions I can anticipate. It's also fits well with sendmail's /etc/mail/access file, which (though I dont' care for the conflation in lookup key) enables particular entries to trigger various failure codes/messages, enable relaying, etc. Not crazy about the bang as an errorcode selector, though. If a line in badrcptto is doing to trigger a DENYHARD, it may as well say DENYHARD (or DENY or DISCONNECT or whatever) and eliminate the uncertainty. -- Devin \ aqua(at)devin.com, IRC:Requiem; http://www.devin.com Carraway \ 1024D/E9ABFCD2: 13E7 199E DD1E 65F0 8905 2E43 5395 CA0D E9AB FCD2
