On 5/31/06, Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Removing the daemonize stuff completely is going a bit to far (at > least from my point of view),I agree. Though I do think since we now have qpsmtpd-prefork and qpsmtpd-forkserver, we should use a wrapper for daemonizing. Matt.
This would be ideal in order to minimize code duplication and give users maximum choice (supervice/rnuit/deamonize/...). -- Lars Roland
