-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> I am quite sure that at the time I noticed it it was documented
> behaviour (since it obviously did work with spamc despite what I read
> in the docs I assumed that spamc sent an explicit TELL command, but I
> didn't check that).
> 
> I can't find it now in the docs, but I notice that it does work with
> Spamassassin 3.1.4 on a Debian box, but doesn't with Spamassassin 3.1.3
> on a Redhat box. Maybe there's something wrong with the Spamassassin
> installation on the Redhat box.

I've used spamd with Bayes and autolearning on RHEL 3/4 and Fedora Core
4/5/6 since version 3.1.0 of SpamAssassin I think (currently 3.1.4 on
RHEL4 and Fedora Core 6) with no issues.

I had a poke through the doco and couldn't find mention of any issues.

Regards

James Turnbull

- --
James Turnbull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- ---
Author of Pro Nagios 2.0
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/)

Hardening Linux
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/)
- ---
PGP Key (http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x0C42DF40)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFqW/P9hTGvAxC30ARAmKNAJ9ubBoI3XzM42+D0cUiPiONUzFelgCdGF7s
ohtdJNj8wZ9EOPYCdXBXU6E=
=4AeA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to