On Sun, 6 May 2007, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 6-May-07, at 1:32 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 13:22 -0400, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On 6-May-07, at 10:34 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:> > > It's a bit tricky to compute the timezone correctly, though. > > Why not just use gmtime and output +0000 ?RFC 2822, p15. The date and time-of-day SHOULD express local time.It's only a SHOULD :-)
Indeed. And IMO a faulty recommendation - local time can be ambiguous, UTC is not.
