On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 09:16 -0400, m. allan noah wrote: > > SPF is one of those things that can't possibly work: > > > http://homepages.tesco.net./~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html > > > > there are some very good points in there. too bad they are hard to see > past all the vitriol and absolutism. it would be nice if it was
It follows Bernstein's style and he is a mathematician (24/7, it seems ;-). One of his interests is correctness of proofs ... I think the interpretation of 'absolutism' just reflects that style. However, 'vitriol' seems to be more accurate ... although it may be a consequence of the same mindset. > condensed down to fewer, demonstrable points. -- --gh
